musings

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

makes sense?

Why is it that 5 days later the cops were combing thru dirt when looking for evidence in the Sean Bell murder?
Why is it that this mysterious 4th person who is the infamous strapped individual that no one can give a description or even place him at the sceene?
Why is it that the initial shooter is the only person that says that he he yelled "Police" before he began to fire when at least 5 other witness says he never uttered a word...?
Why was the individual who was shot 3 times still on the ground in handcuffs when the news cameras got to the scene?
Why is it that 2 cops never fired, 2 others fired less than 4 times and one fired 31 times?
Where was the senior officer?
What 'job' allows you to drink on the job(it is rumored that these 'special undercover officers' are allowed to have 2 beers while actively being on duty) ?
Why is no one calling this incident an assassination?
Why is the previous criminal history of the unarmed individuals being discussed more often than reasons why the officers never revealed their identities?
Why did one 'officer' feel it necessary to fire 31 times(reloading)? Were any of these officers given a breathlyzer? a sobriety test even?
Im tight
Why is it that I have not heard one public(or private, for that matter) Im sorry or a general apology from any of the officers involved?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home